Editorial policy

Radiant Arts Review aims to be accurate, independent and clear about the difference between observation, interpretation and established information. We write with care and revise when a meaningful error comes to light.

Accuracy and context

We check factual statements against appropriate published material and make the limits of an interpretation clear. Descriptions of an artwork should not be presented as proof of an artist's intention unless that intention is supported by reliable evidence. When context is uncertain or contested, we say so rather than smoothing it away.

Independence

Editorial choices are made for their relevance to readers and the subject, not because a contributor or partner requests favourable coverage. We do not promise positive treatment in exchange for access, payment or promotion.

Corrections

If you spot a factual error or a misleading description, contact us through the Contact page and identify the article and passage. We review credible correction requests and amend material when warranted, making significant corrections clear to readers.

Partners and illustrations

Paid or partner material is labelled so readers can distinguish it from independent editorial work. Any collaboration is considered separately from editorial judgement. Some illustrations may be AI-generated; when they are, we identify them as such and do not present them as documentary images of artworks or events.